🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. Preferred providers. Non-preferred providers. Concierge medical services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Co-payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Medical advisors. Affordable Care Act. HMO. PPO. EPO. Point of Service. HDHP. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. Explanation of Benefits. COBRA. Small Business Health Options Program. Single coverage. Family coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who comprehends this complex system? Not the typical business owner. Neither the average worker. Choosing the appropriate healthcare insurance for our business – or for households – seems like it requires advanced expertise in medical insurance.

The Medical System Isn't Just Complex, It Is Expensive

According to recent research, typical households pays $twenty-seven thousand annually on medical coverage (increasing by 6% compared to last year). Typical company healthcare expense is expected to surpass $17,000 per employee in 2026, an increase of 9.5% from 2025.

Currently federal operations has ceased functioning due to political disagreements regarding tax credits that experts say could cause premium increases up to 100% for numerous US citizens.

When Will We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate a national health insurance program here in America? I have to believe we're getting closer because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not proposing government-run medicine. I'm advocating for our current Medicare program – an established insurance framework – simply expand to cover everyone. Our infrastructure remains intact. The way medical professionals receive payment would change. Believe me, they'll adapt.

How Universal Coverage Could Function

A national health insurance program would require contributions from workers and companies. In comparable systems, an employee earning average wages must contribute approximately 5.3% toward medical coverage. The company pays about thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this seem expensive? Unless you contrast it to what average American pays. I know dozens of businesses who are easily contributing between eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. Remember that in inclusive programs, these contributions also cover pension plans, illness coverage, maternity leave and unemployment benefits along with funding healthcare facilities. When you add these expenses compared with what we pay for our retirement plans, unemployment insurance and paid time off, the difference decreases.

Execution in the US

In the US, a national health premium would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a framework that is already in place. It ought to be means-based – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. This includes both worker and company payments. And, like much of our government's defense, technology, welfare services and transportation services, the system should be outsourced by private contractors rather than federal agencies.

Benefits for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program would be a significant advantage for small businesses such as my company. It would put us on a level playing field against big corporations that can pay for superior coverage. It would make administration much easier (automatic payroll withholding remitted like social security and healthcare taxes, instead of individual transactions to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would make simpler to plan expenses annual expenditures, rather than going through the complicated (and fruitless) theater of bargaining with the big insurance providers required annually each year. Due to simplification, there would be improved comprehension of coverage by our employees – contrasted with the current system which require them to decipher the complications of current options. And there would definitely exist less liability for companies as we no longer would be privy to our employees' health histories for purposes of weighing risks and alternative plans.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as pro-market as they get. But I've learned that public institutions play important functions in society, from providing defense to funding needed infrastructure. Providing healthcare to all through a national insurance system enhances our economy's infrastructure. It's a better, easier system for entrepreneurs that employ more than half of American employees and generate half of our GDP. It enables for workers to enjoy better health, have better attendance and be more productive.

Considering Challenges

Exist numerous factors I'm not addressing? Certainly. Given all the healthcare cost increases we've seen recently, it's evident that current healthcare legislation is not working effectively. And I realize that we're not a small, Scandinavian country where big changes are easier to implement. However extending Medicare for all, even with increased taxation required, would still be a superior and more affordable approach for not only managing medical expenses but providing access for all citizens.

Need for Honest Assessment

We as Americans, we need to reduce our own arrogance. Our healthcare system isn't exceptional. We rank well below many other countries with the best healthcare in the world, according to comprehensive research. Perhaps a bright spot in this present circumstances is that we take serious examination at ourselves and acknowledge that major reforms are necessary.